<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Комментарии: Структура международной аудиторской компании</title>
	<atom:link href="http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/</link>
	<description>Обьясните мне в нескольких словах о чем этот блог?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:28:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Автор: Lev</title>
		<link>http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Lev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Нашёл сегодня вот такой список стандартных tickmarks. Если будет время - переведу, но некоторые просто ОЧЕНЬ в тему:

In the spirit of identifying and implementing Firm efficiencies, the following standard tickmarks should be used to respond to frequently encountered review points.

A You might consider reading my explanation in the work papers.

B When I get a realistic budget, I&#039;ll perform the program steps.

c How far in the ground would you like me to beat this subject? Should I contact Alan Greenspan, how &#039;bout FASB headquarters, maybe God, yeah God oughta know?

d Webster defines immaterial as: &quot;that which does not matter, not pertinent, unimportant.&quot;

e Perhaps materiality is assessed too low. Then again YOU assessed it.

f You must have &quot;discussed this&quot; with someone else.

g Noted, for next year. (I&#039;m not really interested in this year, and will probably be working somewhere else next year).

h Sorry, I thought it was your job to review the work.

i Frankly, it never crossed my mind.

j You make the assumption that the client has a basic knowledge of accounting.

k You make the assumption that I have a basic knowledge of accounting.

l Forgive me for having a hangover on Sunday morning. Even though my
face is green, I&#039;ll still bleed tickmark red.

m I&#039;m certain this is an isolated error. Further work is NOT necessary.

n My training class was different. We never covered this subject.

o For all manager questions that begin with &quot;Why...&quot;: Yes, I will find the answer to that question, just as I will build a rocket ship and explore
the face of Mars.

p YOU told me to do it like this, and though I find your indecision amusing, if you want it changed again, &quot;You da man!&quot;

q Of course I agree this explanation is not reasonable - so I&#039;ll just tell the Controller that he&#039;s a lying bastard and that we are recommending
a major SEC investigation.

r You said foot within reason, I thought a difference of $2 million was
reasonable.

s But that&#039;s what YOU did last year.

t Screw off. I have a standing job offer in the industry.

u Because this place is a shit hole. You know that and I know that. The friggin&#039; controller knows that. The truth is that there is no friggin&#039; way we&#039;ll ever find all of the crap that they&#039;ve hung up in the balance sheet,except maybe if we recover about 12%. You really don&#039;t want that, do you?!?!

v But where is the risk?? Why should I give a shit??

w Because all of the assholes who did the job last year left, and left me with nothing but a pissed off controller. That&#039;s why.

x If you knew the freakin&#039; answer to begin with, why didn&#039;t you clue me in on it before the client ripped my skull off.

y I fucked up, that&#039;s why. Next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Нашёл сегодня вот такой список стандартных tickmarks. Если будет время &#8212; переведу, но некоторые просто ОЧЕНЬ в тему:</p>
<p>In the spirit of identifying and implementing Firm efficiencies, the following standard tickmarks should be used to respond to frequently encountered review points.</p>
<p>A You might consider reading my explanation in the work papers.</p>
<p>B When I get a realistic budget, I&#8217;ll perform the program steps.</p>
<p>c How far in the ground would you like me to beat this subject? Should I contact Alan Greenspan, how &#8217;bout FASB headquarters, maybe God, yeah God oughta know?</p>
<p>d Webster defines immaterial as: &#171;that which does not matter, not pertinent, unimportant.&#187;</p>
<p>e Perhaps materiality is assessed too low. Then again YOU assessed it.</p>
<p>f You must have &#171;discussed this&#187; with someone else.</p>
<p>g Noted, for next year. (I&#8217;m not really interested in this year, and will probably be working somewhere else next year).</p>
<p>h Sorry, I thought it was your job to review the work.</p>
<p>i Frankly, it never crossed my mind.</p>
<p>j You make the assumption that the client has a basic knowledge of accounting.</p>
<p>k You make the assumption that I have a basic knowledge of accounting.</p>
<p>l Forgive me for having a hangover on Sunday morning. Even though my<br />
face is green, I&#8217;ll still bleed tickmark red.</p>
<p>m I&#8217;m certain this is an isolated error. Further work is NOT necessary.</p>
<p>n My training class was different. We never covered this subject.</p>
<p>o For all manager questions that begin with &#171;Why&#8230;&#187;: Yes, I will find the answer to that question, just as I will build a rocket ship and explore<br />
the face of Mars.</p>
<p>p YOU told me to do it like this, and though I find your indecision amusing, if you want it changed again, &#171;You da man!&#187;</p>
<p>q Of course I agree this explanation is not reasonable &#8212; so I&#8217;ll just tell the Controller that he&#8217;s a lying bastard and that we are recommending<br />
a major SEC investigation.</p>
<p>r You said foot within reason, I thought a difference of $2 million was<br />
reasonable.</p>
<p>s But that&#8217;s what YOU did last year.</p>
<p>t Screw off. I have a standing job offer in the industry.</p>
<p>u Because this place is a shit hole. You know that and I know that. The friggin&#8217; controller knows that. The truth is that there is no friggin&#8217; way we&#8217;ll ever find all of the crap that they&#8217;ve hung up in the balance sheet,except maybe if we recover about 12%. You really don&#8217;t want that, do you?!?!</p>
<p>v But where is the risk?? Why should I give a shit??</p>
<p>w Because all of the assholes who did the job last year left, and left me with nothing but a pissed off controller. That&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>x If you knew the freakin&#8217; answer to begin with, why didn&#8217;t you clue me in on it before the client ripped my skull off.</p>
<p>y I fucked up, that&#8217;s why. Next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Автор: petrenko.com.ua</title>
		<link>http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>petrenko.com.ua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/#comment-535</guid>
		<description>inna, пройдёте это - дальше можно будет не работать :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>inna, пройдёте это &#8212; дальше можно будет не работать <img src='http://petrenko.com.ua/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Автор: inna</title>
		<link>http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>inna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>очень точно и по делу. будучи аудитором первого года все чувствуешь на своей шкуре. самостоя тельнось приветствуется редко, но часто ожидается.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>очень точно и по делу. будучи аудитором первого года все чувствуешь на своей шкуре. самостоя тельнось приветствуется редко, но часто ожидается.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Автор: Саша</title>
		<link>http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Саша</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 05:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petrenko.com.ua/seen/big4/audit-company-structure/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Вот ссылка для аудиторов http://voffka.com/archives/2006/09/22/030106.html   надо бы разобраться ,в чём там дело... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Вот ссылка для аудиторов <a href="http://voffka.com/archives/2006/09/22/030106.html" rel="nofollow">http://voffka.com/archives/2006/09/22/030106.html</a>   надо бы разобраться ,в чём там дело&#8230; <img src='http://petrenko.com.ua/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: petrenko.com.ua @ 2012-05-22 03:43:45 -->
